In the first jobs report since the abrupt firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, the data came in with a thud. The U.S. economy added just 22,000 jobs in August, far short of the 75,000 economists had expected. It was the weakest print in nearly four years and confirmation that the labor market, once running hot, is finally cooling.

For years, we’ve suggested that monthly job growth in the 150,000–200,000 range was too high for the Federal Reserve to ease its foot off the brake. But now? Even seasoned Fed watchers admit the labor market is starting to wobble. The question is whether this is the soft landing everyone hoped for—or the start of something more.

Per usual, the recession calls are overstated. Even with tariff noise, GDPNow’s estimate for Q3 is 3% GDP growth.

The markets have assumed a 50-basis-point rate cut for later this year. But with job growth barely above water and unemployment creeping higher, some are asking whether the Fed will have to move more aggressively in 2026.

Of course, monetary policy is only part of the picture. Confidence in labor market data has been rattled since President Trump ousted McEntarfer, claiming previous reports were “rigged.” While most economists believe the BLS remains politically independent, optics matter. When trust in the numbers erodes, it complicates not just Fed policy but business planning and investment decisions.

As we’ve predicted, the rise of AI doesn’t necessarily mean mass layoffs. Instead, its impact is subtler but equally consequential: it makes companies more cautious about hiring. Why bring on an extra analyst or marketing associate when AI tools can absorb some of that output?

The result is a labor market where employers aren’t firing in droves—but they’re also not adding at prior rates. This “no hire, no fire” reality creates a slow bleed for younger and less experienced workers, who find fewer rungs on the ladder and less mobility when trying to switch jobs.

Private employers are approaching the cooling labor market with a mix of caution and opportunism. Rather than pulling back across the board, they’re selectively adding roles tied to long-term priorities while trimming those seen as replaceable or overstaffed.

Still hiring: Companies continue to invest in technology, data, and compliance roles. Cloud engineers, cybersecurity specialists, and AI integration managers remain in demand as firms race to modernize operations. Healthcare and logistics employers are also posting steady gains, driven by demographic pressures and supply chain realignment. Even in a softer market, revenue-generating positions like enterprise sales and customer success are still being added—no one wants to risk growth stalling because they didn’t have the right client-facing talent.

Pulling back: Employers are cautious about entry-level administrative and analyst roles, many of which are being absorbed by automation or outsourced solutions. Routine manufacturing jobs are also contracting, with factories hesitant to add headcount given higher borrowing costs and AI-driven productivity gains. Middle management hiring has slowed as firms try to “do more with less,” stretching existing leaders rather than adding new layers.

Hiring isn’t frozen—but it’s targeted. Employers are signaling they’ll spend on capabilities that future-proof the business, while quietly sidelining roles that don’t.

Aspire With Emma Grede: Candid entrepreneurial stories with celebrity insight and real-life inspiration